|
|
ATTAINABLE
GOALS
UNFAIR
GAMES VS. FAIR GAMES
In
unfair games, a maximum boldness strategy is optimal: Craps, Roulette,
Slots, Black Jack.In fair games, a minimum boldness strategy is
optimal: Poker, Sports Betting, Horse Racing.So if you were rolling
the dice in Las Vegas, a game where the odds will be against you,
you would be smart to bet all or most of your bankroll on a few
rolls and hope to be lucky. The longer you play, the more likely
you will lose.
If you're playing the horses, and you have become a talented handicapper,
you're smart to bet a relatively small amount (2% of a bankroll)
on a large number of races you understand, and depend upon your
skill. The longer you play the more you win.
HOW MUCH MONEY CAN GOOD HANDICAPPERS
WIN IN A YEAR?
It depends upon:
(A) Your skill
(B) How much you bet on key horses to win
YOUR SKILL
If
you know your win percentage and the average odds on your winners,
you can estimate your winning edge. Your edge is equal to your
win percentage multiplied by your average odds on winners, and
that product minus your loss percentage.
The amount of money you can expect to win is equal to the amount
you bet during the year multiplied by your edge. So if you have
a 22% edge on the game and you bet $100,000 during the year, you
can expect to win $22,000. Which is a nice profit from your hobby
and an exciting game!
Here are the attainable goals for skillful handicappers:
| Win% |
Aver.
Odds |
Edge |
| 30% |
5-2 |
.05 |
| 33% |
5-2 |
.15 |
| 35% |
5-2 |
.22 |
| 40% |
5-2 |
.40
|
The
average odds are held constant at 5-2 because in reality they
do not vary much on key horses to win.
The edge is equal to your return on investment (ROI). If your
edge is 20%, that means for every dollar you bet, you can expect
to get back $1.20. Investors, savers, and business men and women
would be pleased to do as well.
Notice that handicappers who improve their skill by 10%(30%
to 32%) have tripled their profits (.05 to .15). How nice! It
pays to improve your handicapping.
THE AMOUNT OF MONEY YOU BET
Nobody
can make a decent profit at the races by betting $2, $5, or
$10 on key horses to win. Bet size should vary between $20 and
$200, beginning at the smaller amount. Handicappers can increase
the size as experience, proficiency, and confidence allow.
Because
newcomers and casual handicappers invariably are curious to
know, most leading handicappers and successful players bet $200
or thereabouts on the one, two, or three key bets to win they
find on a day at the races. Some bet significantly more, and
others bet less than half as much.
As a rule, handicappers can expect to find one, two, or three
key bets to win each day, an average of two. If regular handicappers
play 200 days in a year, the number of key bets to win will
be 400 and the amount wagered will be between $8,000 ($20) and
$80,000 ($200).
Now would-be handicappers have a basis for estimating how much
money they might make when betting to win in any calendar year.
Imagine yourself a successful horse player and plug yourself
in at one or more of the handicapping and betting levels in
the grid below.
$20 WIN BETTOR
| WIN% |
ODDS |
EDGE |
BET |
BETS |
INVESTMENT |
PROFIT |
| 25% |
5-2 |
(.12) |
$20 |
400 |
$8,000 |
($1000) |
| 30% |
5-2 |
.05 |
$20 |
400 |
$8,000 |
$400 |
| 33% |
5-2 |
.15 |
$20 |
400 |
$8,000 |
$1,200 |
| 35% |
5-2 |
.22 |
$20 |
400 |
$8,000 |
$1,760 |
| 40% |
5-2 |
.40 |
$20 |
400 |
$8,000 |
$3,200 |
$200 WIN BETTOR
| WIN% |
ODDS |
EDGE |
BET |
BETS |
INVESTMENT |
PROFIT |
| 33% |
5-2 |
.15 |
$20 |
400 |
$80,000 |
$12,000 |
| 35% |
5-2 |
.22 |
$20 |
400 |
$80,000 |
$17,600 |
| 40% |
5-2 |
.40 |
$20 |
400 |
$80,000 |
$32,000 |
In the age of full-card simulcasting, successful handicappers
are playing multiple tracks each day, or more precisely, one-two-three
bets at each of multiple tracks. Profits that formerly accumulated
just at the local track can now accumulate at two, three, or
four tracks each year. So dedicated handicappers, by all means,
can multiply the potential profits resulting at one track from
their skill by two, three, or four.
None of this has any relevance to exotic wagering. Successful
handicappers also play the daily doubles, exactas, trifectas,
and serial bets such as the Pick 3 and Pick 6 every day. The
edge on any exotic wager depends upon the value expected from
that specific betting situation, and is relatively unpredictable
from year to year, or even from month to month, week to week,
and day to day.
Effective strategies for playing the various exotic wagers are
important, and they will be described in detail in this CD-ROM,
but they are not related in any systemic way to the profits
talented handicappers can expect year after year.
PRIME BETS TO WIN
A standard of excellence in handicapping is the ability to earn
a 20 percent rate of profit on prime bets to win. A prime bet
means a high-probability contender that has a clear decisive
edge on the field and has been offered at a fair price. Numerous
handicappers are talented enough to satisfy the 20 percent standard.
But few do.
Handicappers who win 30 percent of their prime bets at average
odds of 5-2 share a 5 percent edge on the game. For every dollar
wagered to win, they receive $1.05 in return, a 5 percent profit.
A handicapper who can win as frequently as the crowd, 33 percent,
but at 5-2 odds (the public averages 8-5), boasts a splendid
15 percent edge on the game. As Dick Mitchell has pointed out,
by improving handicapping proficiency 10 percent, profits triple.
This is the attainable goal all recreational handicappers should
set sails to achieve 33 percent winners, average odds of 5-2,
a 15 percent edge and profit margin. The reality for the casual
majority is closer to 30 percent winners at odds of 5-2, a mere
5 percent profit margin.
The "edge" is important. A handicapper's true edge
on the game suggests the optimal bet-size. It's the edge divided
by the odds to $1.00. If the handicapper has a 5 percent and
the horse is 5-2, the optimal bet is 5/2.5, or 2 percent.
To bet more is to bet too much in relation to actual proficiency,
and guarantees a long-term loss. Overly aggressive betting is
ruinous in horse racing. To bet less is to win at a rate of
profit less than actual proficiency allows, a sad but not desperate
circumstance.
VALUE BETS TO WIN
Value bets to win involve horses having a handicapper's reasonably
good chance, but at conspicuously generous odds. The odds will
be twice as great as expected, or longer than that. Instead
of fair value, the handicapper perceives excellent value, perhaps
outrageous value.
The horses do not figure convincingly, and many will not be
first choices. Betting decisions remain equivocal, but the price
exerts an undeniable pull
In certain situations, as in contentious races, the horses may
be mild first choices offered upward of 8-1. That's value, as
the horses can be expected to win at least once in eight attempts,
probably more than once.
Or, the value bets may be unexpected overlays at 10-1 or better
in contentious fields where lukewarm first and second choices
have been overbet.
In predictable races, first choices may be severely overbet,
leaving the handicapper's second or third alternative as an
outstanding board attraction.
Or false favorites may be ridiculously overbet, such that a
pair of reasonable alternatives go to the post at very attractive
prices.
Or an angle horse in a relatively unpredictable race may be
offered at irresistible odds.
Value bets are characterized by lower probabilities of winning
than prime bets, so losing runs can be extended. If a horse
has roughly a 20 percent chance (4-1), actual odds should be
6-1. A horse that has a 15 percent chance (6-1), should be 10-1
on the board, or better. A horse having a 10 percent chance
(9-1) should be 15-1, minimum.
Bet-size should be a portion of the prime bet to win, not an
equivalent amount. Stronger opinions can receive 50 percent
of prime, weaker opinions 10 to 20 percent.
How will recreational handicappers know whether value bets to
win are tossing real winnings, or losses?
It's strictly an empirical question. Handicappers must keep
a record of the value bets and study the results. A year's worth
of results on 8-1 shots, or greater, reveals the trend. Two
year's data tell a fairly accurate story.
BETTING TO PLACE AND SHOW
Whether expert or novice, mass confusion thwarts veritably all
attempts to earn money at the races in the place and show holes,
which is possible but improbable.
Recreational handicappers should not bet overlays and longshots
to place or show. They are probably underlays in those pools.
Alternately, low-priced favorites can often become overlays
to place and show. Odds-on favorites often should be bet to
place and show, not to win.
Exacta bettors commit three mortal mistakes every racing day.
The put too many overbet favorites on top, thereby creating
numerous exacta underlays.
They buy exacta boxes connecting three horse--baseballs--routinely,
usually a nonsense bet. They bet exacta wheels, absolutely a
nonsense bet.
Remember these maxims:
1. Overbet favorites should be used primarily on the bottom
of exacta combinations.
2. Exacta boxes make sense only when both sides represent overlays.
3. Key horses should be coupled in partial wheels only, limited
to other contenders that are overlays.
Exacta bettors must realize the nature of the exotic risk opens
the possibility of extended losing runs. Low-probability events
can happen infrequently over longer periods, certainly throughout
the run of a race meeting.
The exacta is the competent contemporary handicapper's best
friend. It affords the occasional customer a chance for meaningful
profits in the short run, as win wagering does not. If recreational
handicappers respect the bet and play it smartly, they should
do all right much of the time, and at times they will reel in
the big ones.
|